Science Fiction Novels
Arts & Lit | By Wes for The Top 13 on January 12, 2010
Science Fiction. These two words can send even the most level-headed bibliophile to the nearest exit. Admittedly the genre is littered with offal, and regrettably, for every masterful work, there are heaps of stereotypical dreck. So it's no surprise that the kneejerk reaction is refusal or derision, though these same observations may be made of other genres. Figuring out where to start in any unfamiliar territory can be daunting. Fortunately, we've separated the wheat from the chaff for you and present The Top 13 Science Fiction Novels.
|
|
1 |
Frank Herbert - Dune1965 |
|
|
2 |
John Steakley - Armor1984 |
|
|
3 |
Neal Stephenson - Snow Crash1992 |
|
|
4 |
Dan Simmons - Hyperion1989 |
|
|
5 |
Isaac Asimov - Foundation1951 |
|
|
6 |
Vernor Vinge - A Fire Upon The Deep1992 |
|
|
7 |
China Miéville - Perdido Street Station2000 |
|
|
8 |
Richard K. Morgan - Altered Carbon2002 |
|
|
9 |
Philip K. Dick - A Scanner Darkly1977 |
|
|
10 |
Iain M. Banks - Consider Phlebas1987 |
|
|
11 |
Stephen Baxter - The Time Ships1995 |
|
|
12 |
Robert A. Heinlein - The Moon is a Harsh Mistress1966 |
|
|
13 |
Arthur C. Clarke - Rendezvous with Rama1972 |
KungFuJay ★★
Bildungsroman? That's not a word. You made that up.
10:20 AM Jan 12, 2010
holmessss ★
What! No Ray Bradbury! I would also include J.G. Ballard, Harlan Ellison, H.P. Lovecraft, and Margaret Atwood. Admittedly some of these authors veer into other genres (fantasy, dystopian, horror), but Sci-Fi is a rather amorphous term that includes a pretty broad range of fiction. Interesting choices though.
10:54 AM Jan 12, 2010
oncomouse
Overall, it seems like this list is too skewed away from pre-1960s SF. Why no H.G. Wells or _Frankenstein_ (which is awesome, btw)? What about Edgar Rice Burroughs or Theodore Sturgeon or Alfred Bester (I mean, seriously! Have you read _The Stars, My Destination_? It's incredible. Easily the best SF novel ever), as well as the writers holmessss mentioned.
Overall, these selections seem really strange. I haven't read _Armor_, but a lot of stuff I've heard about it suggest that it's pretty derivative of _Starship Troopers_ (which is awesome). Also, I can't imagine a better anti-war SF novel than _The Forever War_ by Joe Haldeman.
The biggest problem, for me, with this list is the inclusion of Richard K. Morgan. I mean, come on. I loved that book, but "best" "of all time"? Please. It's escapist & mindlessly violent, at it's best. The whole "we can move our minds around to different bodies" isn't that original & the SF + noir thing is kind of cool, but, again, it's been done. As much as I loved it, there's nothing redeeming or exemplary about the novel.
I would have agreed with this post-1960s bias a few years ago, but now that I've started teaching an SF course at a university, I've discovered that a lot of the best of the genre was written prior to 1970, and this list seems to ignore a lot of the classics from that period.
Also, why no women writers? Joanna Russ's _The Female Man_ is easily better than all the books on this list.
11:41 AM Jan 12, 2010
Travelin_Jack ★
First, let me say that we really appreciate your comments and input. To address your points: There is a rather obvious bias against pre 1960's Science Fiction, and the simple reason for that is that I'm not as familiar with it as the more recent material. While there is only one choice from that era, I feel that the picks from Clarke, Heinlein, and Herbert do justice to pre 1970's SciFi, and actually belong amongst the best. You mentioned a few specific books and concern for their not being included on the list. _Frankenstein_ is really borderline science fiction. Plus, it's almost universally known. One of the goals of this list was to provide unique, quality work that others may not have discovered yet. Along those lines, _Starship Troopers_ and _The Forever War_, while both excellent military SciFi, were turned away in favor of _Armor_. And while _Armor_ may not have the heft of those heavyweight names, or even the writing finesse, can you really say you care for their characters when the show's over? There's an emotional intensity to _Armor_ that's really lacking in those novels. In any event, give it a shot. You might like it. Alfred Bester, yes, I've read _The Demolished Man_ but not _Stars_, and was not impressed with the former, but I will gladly read _Stars_. I don't really understand the vitriol towards Morgan and _Altered Carbon_. Sure, he's doesn't have the subtle touch other authors might, but I find it hard to believe that you couldn't find anything about that story to be original. It's one of the most original recent works of the genre. I enjoy female authors, to be sure, but I can offer no real reasons why none rated on the list. A few I've really enjoyed are Nancy Kress, Connie Willis, Ursula K. Le Guin, Octavia E. Butler, and Margaret Atwood (of course). I had not heard of Joanna Russ prior to your comment, but I will look into that book!
12:08 PM Jan 12, 2010
ajay ★★
I've never gotten into science fiction novels, so I haven't read any of these. I was planning on reading Rendezvous with Rama because of the news that David Fincher would be directing a film adaptation, but that project was abandoned. However, I do fully intend on reading some of Isaac Asimov, so maybe I'll start with Foundation.
2:39 PM Jan 12, 2010
bludevil007 ★
Not a big sci-fi guy. Only read A Scanner Darkly on this list. I'm also not sure what the difference is between "sci fi" and "fantasy", but two of my favorites are Rant by Chuck Palahniuk (it strangely becomes a sci fi book about half way through, and it's comicly disturbing) and the entire Dark Tower Series by Stephen King, which is just an entertaining read, even if it isnt "literature"
12:56 AM Jan 13, 2010
bludevil007 ★
oh also, Bradbury needs to be on here
12:57 AM Jan 13, 2010
KDavis
Samuel Delany? No?
2:06 AM Jan 13, 2010
KDavis
When I said Delany, I was mostly talking about Babel-17 and also The Einstein Intersection...
2:18 AM Jan 13, 2010
Reyter
Of the books I have read, "Dune" is fantastic and "Foundation" (only the first 3) only slightly behind. "Armour" is solid and "Hyperion" is massively overrated. Quite bad and difficult to get through. "Consider Phlebas" is pretty good but nothing special. Apart from "Dune" and "Foundation" (only the first 3 of the series) to even suggest any of the others are better than "Ender's Game" is plainly absurd! "Ender's Game" is the best sci-fi novel.
9:41 AM Jun 18, 2011
Please Join or Login to leave a comment








Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Stumbleupon
Delicious

brian ★
I admit to having a lot of reading to do to be conversant in this genre. Only read Dune and A Scanner Darkly, both of which I recall enjoying.
10:06 AM Jan 12, 2010